Season 5, Episode 23. AI, IP, and the Public Good

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming central to areas such as public health, education, agriculture, and climate resilience. In this context, the role of the State is coming into sharper focus, particularly in how governments can shape innovation to serve broad social goals. Intellectual property frameworks, often seen as tools for exclusivity, are being repurposed to support inclusive access and public benefit.

This special episode of Intangiblia was recorded as part of my participation in the workshop “The Role of the State in Advancing Equitable Access to AI,” taking place in Oxford in September 2025. Organized by Sumaya Nur Adan and Joanna Wiaterek, and supported by the Future of Life Institute, the event brings together legal scholars, policymakers, and technologists to examine how States can ensure that the benefits of AI are equitably shared.

The episode explores five legal and policy mechanisms that are already influencing how AI is governed through intellectual property. It discusses Canada’s ongoing efforts to map and license Crown-owned patents under a broader national strategy. It examines Singapore’s copyright reforms, which have introduced clear legal exceptions to support AI model training. The conversation also includes examples of culturally aware AI development, such as the open-source Falcon model in the UAE and community-led Indigenous data initiatives in New Zealand. It looks at how public interest licensing and voluntary IP pools are evolving in fields beyond health, and how state-led initiatives, such as public procurement and open research mandates, are being used to align technological development with social needs.

The episode also reviews recent legal rulings in the United States that have tested the limits of fair use in AI training. These include the 2024 decision involving OpenAI, the 2025 dismissal of claims against Meta, and the Bartz v. Anthropic case presided over by Judge Alsup, which underscored the difference between statistical pattern recognition and direct reproduction of copyrighted works.

Rather than focusing solely on restrictions or incentives, the discussion emphasizes how IP law can serve as a strategic governance tool. By adapting legal frameworks to current challenges, States can guide AI innovation toward inclusive outcomes and help ensure that technological advancement remains aligned with the public good.

Helen Epega: Opera, Synesthesia, and the Invention of Access – Intangiblia™

A live show can be thrilling for one person and terrifying for another, especially when the room offers only vague warnings like “flashing lights.” We sit down with composer, writer, and inventor Helen Epega (The Venus Bushfires) to unpack how synesthesia shapes her world, why it can feel magical and overwhelming at the same time, and how that lived experience becomes a blueprint for better accessibility in the arts.We trace Helen’s journey from Nigeria to London and into opera, where she creates Song Queen, a pidgin English opera that pushes back on who gets cultural legitimacy on elite stages. She shares the surprising mix of welcome, skepticism, and long-term influence that comes with expanding tradition rather than rejecting it. From there we get into her methodology, “Access as Creative Core™,” where accessibility is built into the creative architecture from the first draft, not bolted on at the end.That philosophy leads to HiQuu®, her patent-pending accessibility technology platform for live performance accessibility and digital environments. HiQuu aims to translate a venue’s environment into sensory cues and options like captioning or visual prompts so neurodiverse, blind, and D/deaf audience members can attend together, not in segregated sessions. We also dig into intellectual property, patents, and creator rights in the age of generative AI, including why training on creative work without consent or payment damages the pipeline and why creator-led innovation must guide policy.If you care about inclusive design, assistive tech, copyright, patents, opera, or the future of the creative industry, this conversation offers concrete examples and a bigger vision for belonging. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves live performance, and leave a review with one change you want to see in arts access.Send us Fan MailCheck out "Protection for the Inventive Mind" – available now on Amazon in print and Kindle formats.The views and opinions expressed (by the host and guest(s)) in this podcast are strictly their own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the entities with which they may be affiliated. This podcast should in no way be construed as promoting or criticizing any particular government policy, institutional position, private interest or commercial entity. Any content provided is for informational and educational purposes only.
  1. Helen Epega: Opera, Synesthesia, and the Invention of Access
  2. John Degen: Celebrating Authors, Protecting Creativity
  3. Cécile Deniard: The Human Voice Inside Every Translation
  4. Felene Cayetano: Libraries, Authors, And The Caribbean
  5. Mikaela Taivassalo: Keeping Minority Languages Alive In A Digital Book World

Comment | Comentario

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.