Imagine opening your phone, describing your dispute in simple language, and getting a clear, data-backed path to resolution—without weeks of confusion or a wall of legalese. That’s the future we dig into with lawyer and legal tech builder Nicolas Torrent, who’s helped design online arbitration platforms and shape Switzerland’s legal tech ecosystem. Together we unpack how AI, user experience, and court data can turn access to justice from a maze into a map.

We start with the hard truths: price uncertainty, physical distance, and cognitive barriers keep people out of court. Nicolas lays out how legal design—plain language, smart workflows, and visual cues—can guide users step by step. Then we zoom into the power of data: aggregated outcomes that help people understand their odds, timelines, and likely costs, improving settlement decisions and restoring trust. Speed isn’t just convenience; it’s an economic catalyst. When fair rulings arrive sooner, families and small businesses can move forward with confidence.

We also explore a sustainable path. Nicolas outlines “profitable justice” that doesn’t hide rights behind paywalls: think low-cost online small-claims settlement tools that offer realistic ranges based on similar cases, with an option to escalate to a human judge. Pair this with supervised trainee reviews, pro bono, and targeted lawyer services, and you get a flexible market that meets people where they are. Along the way, we tackle big-picture risks—AGI race dynamics, quantum acceleration, and geopolitical stakes—and why open source, distributed authority, security, and personal accountability must anchor any public system.

Throughout, one principle stays constant: keep humans in control. AI should accelerate routine work, surface patterns, and translate complexity into clarity, while judges and lawyers apply judgment, empathy, and responsibility. If we design for inclusion, treat court data as a strategic public asset, and build with transparency, justice can become faster, fairer, and truly accessible. If this resonates, subscribe, share with a friend, and tell us: which part of the legal journey should be redesigned first?

Playing Around INTA 2026: A Scenario Game for IP Lawyers – Intangiblia™

We’re in London at the INTA 2026 Annual Meeting, but we’re not doing a standard conference recap. We wanted to show how intellectual property work can be creative, inventive, and even fun, so we built THE INVENTIVE MINDSET GAME, a scenario game, and handed real IP lawyers a stack of tricky client prompts.Each prompt forces a choice: do you follow the client’s exact instructions, take an inventive counseling path, bring in an AI assist tool, or throw a curveball and plan for the worst-case scenario. From a smart home invention to a viral character and an influencer launching a skincare line, we dig into the practical decisions behind patent strategy, trademark protection, and copyright, including how to think about prior art, claim scope, brand control, and what “commercialization” actually demands.We also talk about the unglamorous but critical details that can make or break an IP strategy: picking the right trademark classes, avoiding coverage that doesn’t match the business, and sequencing filings when budgets are tight. If you’re a founder, creator, in-house counsel, or just curious about how IP law works in the real world, you’ll leave with clearer mental models and sharper questions to ask before you file anything.Subscribe for more stories and practical IP insights, share this with a friend building a brand, and leave a review if the game format helped you think differently about IP. What would you choose first: safe, inventive, AI-assisted, or curveball?Send us Fan MailCheck out "Protection for the Inventive Mind" – available now on Amazon in print and Kindle formats.The views and opinions expressed (by the host and guest(s)) in this podcast are strictly their own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the entities with which they may be affiliated. This podcast should in no way be construed as promoting or criticizing any particular government policy, institutional position, private interest or commercial entity. Any content provided is for informational and educational purposes only.

1. Playing Around INTA 2026: A Scenario Game for IP Lawyers 08:56
2. Sports As IP Strategy 15:15
3. The Afterlife of Innovation: Can IP Outlive the Business That Created It? 19:44
4. Case Study: Lindt’s Gold Bunny Trademark Saga 22:40
5. What Kind of Negotiator Are You, Really? 39:39